WHY DON'T YOU DANCE ON MY TUNE?

A society Can Never be safe if it does not show that it can bear discussion. If you want to govern you must have to arm yourself with the power which knowledge gives.

`It become much important when it comes to deal with democratic society and democratic institution. Governance today is multidimensional exercise, where we need not only to elect the government but also to stand with it so that it can function in desired manner. It doesn't mean that by standing with government one is surrendering his/her loyalty to the government and becoming its subject. A democratic government is nothing without demos backup.

There is a saying that "absence of beauty doesn't mean the presence of ugliness".

Your backup to the government may show your honesty and duty-boundedness towards government, but it  doesn't mean that if you don't dance on government tune you are a threat to nation and society. One who pay for  the piper may call for the tune, but can't force anyone to dance on the same tune. Like supporting government, Criticizing government is an  another aspect of multidimensional democratic governance. So let the  critics criticize because they are not ugly if not beautiful like supporters.

Without muddling through these mug-pot words I would like be straight forward. One of the well known news anchor Ravish Kumar left social network activity. As he  fed-up with all the mischievous comment and threat that he received for his writing. As he was not dancing on the tune on which a majority wants him to dance. Those who abuse him asserts that he is propagating against the particular ideology of the day and trying to misled. Just for a while imagine that all the supporters are right, but can they justify it, how a single man can denounce the ideology. If the ideology is backed by such a huge majority. And if he really succeed in doing so then it simply means that the ideology of the day if not functioning in a desired manner. One thing must be noted here is that it is not the ideology itself which abuse anyone, it's we the followers made the individual having different opinion a soft target to sabotage him/her in order to shows own loyalty.

And please don't you think that it is all about only Ravish and some people like him, in a day to day life we experience that going contrary to the words of majority seen as sin in our society. Be it about politics, women, education, culture or anything else. Any how if your words are getting sidelined only because you are not dancing on desired tune, the democracy and demos will be no more from that very moment. I am not saying that Ravish is always right and did something miracle so we need to follow him. He too is a part of today's media and we all know how honest and what  media today is? Despite all the flaws there must be a room for divergent opinion. This is what democracy and media mean. The very moment you are getting abusive by your words simply mean you are lacking logic. And so what if someone is getting critic to your ideology, if a single person can dare to denounce your ideology can't the majority denounce him by logic and if not then sorry to say he is right and it is we who deserve abuse not he and his family.
And those who thinks that all it is a popularity stunt, then too you are big dump because your stupidity gave him this opportunity.

Thanks
And I stand by him not because of being his supporter but because I don't want to be abolished, as if the celebrity like him can be abused and compelled to take such step in such a manner then just imagine the situation of common man having different opinion.

DEFAMING DHARM

              

A THOUGHT NEVER DIES IT MAY LIE DORMANT FOR SOMETIMES IF THE CONDITIONS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE. AS SOON AS IT GOT FAVORABLE       CONDITION IT SPROUT FROM THE ASHES OF  RUINS.

               May your(M.M KALBURGI) soul rest in peace....RIP

Dharm a notion from where chastity, purity, piousness and all the positivity flows. This is simply what dharm means to me. one of the almost parallel notion of dharm is religion. Yes religion is just one of the parallel notion of dharm its not a complete Dharm in itself. You may be the follower of any religion be it Hinduism, Islam, Christianity any someone different but it dosen’t mean that you are follower of Dharm too.

30th august 2015 M.M KALBURGI a scholar, a liberal thinker, a social activist, and a teacher by profession was shot dead. offenders sound that he was writing against Hinduism, which defame the great Hindu religion and Hindu culture. Actually he tried to find out the loopholes in the religion he was among one such scholar who challenges the existing taboo. May be he was right or may be not. I am neither his advocate nor the opponent of Hinduism.

For a while just think that Kalburgi was defaming Hindu religion and then it was obvious that he was hurting the sentiments of followers of the Hinduism too. In case of religion since the childhood we were taught that one should not raise question over the religious issues, the sentiments attached to it must be free from all if and buts to which we are use to. The notion which is unquestionable means that it is absolute and if something is absolute then it must not need to fear from anything or anyone.

Just tell me one thing that if your Dharm is absolute in such a manner and almighty which has been established time immemorable , then how could it be defamed by a men. If your Dharmik(religious) text are really pious and torchbearer then how could it be defamed by the writings of mere man who possess no super power at all like your Dharm. if your Dharm is really a super-power then how could it be defeated by a mere common man.

No I don’t think that your Dharm is such a almighty and powerful. I find it hard to digest that any human being is capable of defaming Dharm. and some how if he does then trust it was not Dharm. then it would be better to left it. a super natural power like Dharm can never be defamed by mere man.

Dharm always teaches us to win someone by logic not by sword. can the self announced crusader of Hinduism tell me that if Kalburgi was defaming Hinduism then what the self proclaimed god man and godess like Asharam bapu and Radhe maa were adding to the reputation of Hinduism.  both of them are just an example we all know how honest we are to our own religion or dharm.

Despite all its fall and fair, Hinduism has always been known for its tolerance such an incident caste a slur to the Hinduism and made us stand in the queue of Taliban and isis.

Trust me those who are afraid of word, pen and keyboard can never protect any religion or Dharm.

Hinduism is a broad concept it has given space to all one who worship(theist) it and also to them one who don’t(atheist). just remember that followers of Arya samaj are also Hindu, can crusader of today’s Hinduism kill Dayanand saraswati for not having faith in idol worship? just go through the pages of history there is a philosophy of CHARWAK, in hinduism can the so called crusader root-it-out.

critics who could not be answered with logic are now silenced with guns, but one can only kill the thinker not the ideology. 

Now you decide who is defaming DHARM